Wikipedia:Requests for page protection
![]() | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | ||
---|---|---|
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:ProtectedPages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here |
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anon IPs are continually trying to close the AfD, in breach of WP:NACIP. LibStar (talk) 02:50, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Not done. Request was valid at the time, but the AfD has now been closed by an administrator, which should hopefully make this request moot. Please request again if disruption resumes. Sdrqaz (talk) 13:16, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. Supports Russia and has repeatedly condemned Ukraine. The Invasion and the war altogether are contentious topics. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 02:51, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple IP users. Areaseven (talk) 03:34, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP user continuously attempts to add an endorsement on the page cited to social media posts, in violation of WP:ENDORSE, which states that "lists of endorsements should only include endorsements which have been covered by reliable independent sources." Despite being told this over and over again, they refuse to listen. Here's a quote from their most recent edit summary: "WP:ENDORSE requires endorsements to be 'verifiable by reliable sources' but does not mandate that they be covered solely by independent sources." This was after I sent them the aforementioned quote. I feel like I'm bashing my head against the wall, I don't know how to reason with this person. Please do something about this because I'm afraid they're never going to stop. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 03:35, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection as he is being sworn in as Prime Minister of Canada on Friday and the page has already attracted IP vandalism. Wellington Bay (talk) 03:52, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:52, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- I think that this article should be extended-protected because of its notability ShallowC (talk) 15:10, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Frequent rate of vandalism, especially since it is currently featured in ITN. PrimalMustelid (talk) 03:54, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:07, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- Apparently, the edit protection was accepted, but for some reason, it was never applied. PrimalMustelid (talk) 04:10, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- Correction: it was a request for the protection of the "parent" Jaffar Express article that was accepted: Special:PermaLink/1280204302#Jaffar Express. The rejection for this article is at Special:PermaLink/1280034317#2025 Jaffar Express hijacking. Favonian (talk) 09:37, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- Alright, I stand corrected. Still, this page needs protection as soon as possible. PrimalMustelid (talk) 12:41, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- Regarding Special:Diff/1280403871, is
executed soldiers or people they did not like on the spot
actually in the CNN source? Sdrqaz (talk) 13:16, 14 March 2025 (UTC)- “They kept shouting, ‘We will kill anyone who doesn’t come out.’ Then, things took a darker turn. They began checking everyone’s ID cards - Punjabis, Sindhis, Baloch. They separated us into groups. Sometimes, they took soldiers outside and executed them. Other times, they targeted specific individuals. If they had a grudge against someone, they shot him on the spot.” Yes, although I suppose I can specify that this is a witness account. PrimalMustelid (talk) 13:19, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- I think I see the issue: the citation is to an archive link and people (like me) are clicking on that and that doesn't contain the relevant information (while the "live" source does), so it's leading people to remove the information.
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There are some IPs and new accounts that are working in good faith here and semi-protection would shut them out, so let's see how this goes. Sdrqaz (talk) 13:31, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- I see... alright, I replaced the old archive link with a new one with updated info. PrimalMustelid (talk) 13:44, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- Ok, there has to be an easier way for me to bypass the pending changes edits, right? Because I'm struggling to even undo the vandalisms prior to the lock. PrimalMustelid (talk) 14:30, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- “They kept shouting, ‘We will kill anyone who doesn’t come out.’ Then, things took a darker turn. They began checking everyone’s ID cards - Punjabis, Sindhis, Baloch. They separated us into groups. Sometimes, they took soldiers outside and executed them. Other times, they targeted specific individuals. If they had a grudge against someone, they shot him on the spot.” Yes, although I suppose I can specify that this is a witness account. PrimalMustelid (talk) 13:19, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- Regarding Special:Diff/1280403871, is
- Alright, I stand corrected. Still, this page needs protection as soon as possible. PrimalMustelid (talk) 12:41, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- Correction: it was a request for the protection of the "parent" Jaffar Express article that was accepted: Special:PermaLink/1280204302#Jaffar Express. The rejection for this article is at Special:PermaLink/1280034317#2025 Jaffar Express hijacking. Favonian (talk) 09:37, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- Apparently, the edit protection was accepted, but for some reason, it was never applied. PrimalMustelid (talk) 04:10, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism on contentious subject in the news. BobFromBrockley (talk) 04:01, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:07, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP user(s) preemptively changing infobox parameters in light of recent news of the expected changeover from Justin Trudeau and Mark Carney. Leventio (talk) 04:28, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor resumed disruptive speedy deletion tagging after prior protection expried. Jfire (talk) 04:57, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing - sockpuppetry from IP known for WP:GENREWARRIOR. HorrorLover555 (talk) 05:06, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – The subject receives occasional antisemitism. (CC) Tbhotch™ 05:34, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs keep inserting "Greek Cypriot" and similar, with no citations. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 06:13, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: There is a back and forth over what image should be used in the infobox. Since this just happened, semi protection temporarily would prevent constant image changing by IP addresses. Ktkvtsh (talk) 08:20, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. BOVINEBOY2008 09:02, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated addition of unsourced information from anon IP Martinevans123 (talk) 10:04, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs since after 5 March 2025 11:50. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 10:57, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Constantly vandalised by IP sock Scoophole2021 (talk). 11:49, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: malicious content posted by unknown person. Request edit and then protection Keshav Prakash DOP (talk) 11:56, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from numerous IPs. OpalYosutebito (talk) 13:00, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Declined, as talk pages are semi-protected only in the most severe cases of disruption. Two IPs in a day isn't enough, sorry. Sdrqaz (talk) 13:31, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP editors due to increased media attention and widespread trolling in response to the film’s poor filmmaking. NotSome1 (talk) 13:20, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Indian IP seems to be offended that an arabic word translates to "Pig" in their completely unrelated language for this topic and keeps on trying to change it 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 14:11, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent changing of infobox image by LTA IP since November 2024; reverted by multiple editors. Same LTA editor has been returning to this article since at least December 2021. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 14:24, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Skywatcher68 (talk) 14:38, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry. Waxworker (talk) 15:05, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:12, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Indefinite semi-protection: At the time of the template being protected, there were over 1,000 transclusions. Now, there's only 20 or so throughout Wikipedia. Should it be un/semi-protected due to its decline in popularity?. OpalYosutebito (talk) 14:14, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.