Talk:Phantom energy

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy: Cosmology Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Cosmology task force.

Stub

Instead of deleting this, we should just replace it with a stub. The actual concept of phantom energy exists (see the pages which link to it for explanation), this would probably better be classified as vandalism. EagleFalconn 19:26, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)

MOS:INDENT

@ReyHahn: Per your user/talk page, contacting you here. Regarding Special:Diff/1283949144. Per MOS:INDENT:

Do not use : (description list markup) to indent text in articles, even though it is common on talk pages. It causes accessibility problems and outputs invalid HTML. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility § Indentation for alternatives.
To display a mathematical formula in its own indented paragraph, use <math display="block">...</math>. See Help:Displaying a formula#Block for more details.

Seeing as I was the one who corrected it to begin with, I won’t revert your reversion. However, I want to make sure you’re aware of this.

If you don’t like how it displays with display="block" (At least on my phone, it looks semi-awful with mobile web vector, centered on the page, but…), you could always convert it to inline instead of re-inserting broken HTML that’s bad for accessibility. Maybe. IDK. You really didn’t provide an edit summary to justify the change, so I’m not sure. I’d love to hear your thoughts! EmptySora_ (talk) 09:19, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]